Preparing a Product for Review

5 views Markdown

Every product you submit is reviewed by hand: what completes each section, what the review looks at and which gaps come back most often.

Overview

Submission is not automatic. Every product and every new release goes through the WISECP team's quality review and a baseline security assessment.

The readiness meter in the editor is a copy of the rule, not the rule itself. On submission the server counts the sections again and refuses anything incomplete.

Review is a quality gate, not a design audit. Most requests that come back concern what a buyer reads before purchasing rather than the product itself.

Prerequisites

A submittable state Only a draft or a product that came back for changes can be sent. One in review or cancelled cannot.
An active subscription Submitting and resubmitting need Premium Developer.
Verified identity When documents are requested, upload them to your account. The product does not enter the queue until they are approved.
An installable package One archive carrying the whole product. Directory layout and what must never go in: Packaging a Module for Distribution.

Structure

A section is complete only when its own answer is. The table below says what completes each one.

SectionWhat completes it
Product identityTitle, category and a one-line summary
Product pitchAt least 120 characters of description in your primary language, a logo and at least one screenshot
PricingThe free model, or a commercial model carrying at least one priced offer
LicensingNo check declared, or a declared check whose test has passed
CompatibilityVersion number, oldest supported WISECP, and the purchase address on a paid product
Installation fileThe complete package for that version
ReviewThree confirmations: distribution rights, testing, installation documentation. Not asked once the product is live

Licensing is a step of its own and does not follow the price: a free product may require a check, and a paid one may ship without any. The highest supported WISECP version is not asked for — leaving it empty means there is no upper bound.

Walkthrough

Before you submit

  1. Read the description as a buyer would: what the product does, who it suits, what it needs.
  2. Take screenshots from the product's real screens; a cover image alone is not enough.
  3. Write the compatibility range from versions you actually tested. The upper end is a gate: installations above it cannot download the package.
  4. Leave the package for last, so the archive already carries the licensing you configured above it.

Submit

  1. Tick the three confirmations in the review section.
  2. Select Submit for Review. The product enters the queue and the editor becomes read-only.
  3. You may withdraw it until a moderator picks it up; after that the decision is awaited.

After the decision

  1. When changes are requested, the reason appears on the record. Correct what it names and send the product again.
  2. An approved product goes live; every later update goes through its own release submission.
  3. While live, description, artwork and price stay editable, and every section opens directly. A new package can still be uploaded from here, but sending it takes the card out of the catalogue until the decision comes back; a version number and a licence change normally travel with a release.

Reference

Distribution rights confirmation You state that the package holds no third-party content whose licence forbids distribution.
Testing confirmation You state that you tested the product across the range written in the compatibility section.
Documentation confirmation You state that installation and configuration steps are available somewhere the buyer can reach.
Verified fields The licence check, the package and the version number are what a moderator verified. Changing them means a new submission, which is why the editor warns before it accepts one.
What review covers Quality review and a baseline security assessment. It is not a full security audit of the product; responsibility stays with the developer.

Example

A refused submission names each missing section. The reading below shows the three most common gaps.

Readiness meter
Product identity  complete
Product pitch     missing   -> description 96 characters (120 required)
Pricing           missing   -> commercial model selected, no priced offer
Licensing         missing   -> check declared, test never passed
Compatibility     complete
Installation file missing   -> no package uploaded
Review            complete

The character count is measured on the text a visitor reads, after formatting tags are stripped. Empty paragraphs do not reach the threshold.

Pitfalls

Declaring a licence check without testing it

A declared check must have passed its test, whatever the product costs. An untested one does not complete the section and the submission is refused.

What must stay out of the package

The archive carries the product itself: your configuration file, database dumps, personal keys and development leftovers do not belong in it.

Downloading requires a WISECP licence

Even a free product is handed only to an account with an active WISECP service. The buyer needs a system to install it on.

Was this helpful?

Thanks for your feedback!

Still Need Help?

Our support team is here around the clock for anything you can't find above.